Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IQ Press

=[[IQ Press]]=

:{{la|IQ Press}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/IQ_Press Stats])

:({{Find sources|IQ Press}})

  • Delete. Non-notable company. Refs are mainly from the subject. Contested PROD. PROD removed by the SPA who created the aricle. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:42, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm (TCGE) 07:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)



:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:11, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


  • Delete The provided refs are primary and I can find nothing elsewhere to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 08:13, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's a small, young, niche publishing house. Nothing notable about it. PKT(alk) 16:03, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete appears to be a promotional article with no reliable independent sources. Fails the WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 01:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.