Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISCAST

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

=[[:ISCAST]]=

:{{la|ISCAST}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=ISCAST}})

Unable to find independent sources. Daask (talk) 10:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Daask (talk) 10:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 10:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.–Cupper52^Discuss! 12:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Delete, article fails WP:GNG it is sourced only to its own website and a search brought up only primary sources, and it is also heavily promotional. Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete Article is severely WP:PROMO and the subject does not pass the notability requirements laid out in WP:N. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 15:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Keep -- meets GNG: [https://www.eternitynews.com.au/australia/when-the-apocalypse-miracles-and-science-of-the-bible-meet-online/ source one], [https://creation.com/the-skeptics-and-their-churchian-allies-iscast-responds source 2], [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Evolution_in_the_Antipodes/o-c1IZtSnoIC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22iscast%22+%22Australia%22&pg=PA279&printsec=frontcover source 3]; and also is listed with other notable groups [https://www.google.com/books/edition/God_Humanity_and_the_Cosmos_3rd_edition/PeYRBwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22iscast%22+%22Australia%22&pg=PA42&printsec=frontcover here].--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 23:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Relisted to allow further analysis of the sources provided by {{np|Epiphyllumlover}}.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 02:53, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Delete, I don't think there is any dispute as to the existence of this organization, so of course there will be passing mentions on niche websites et al. Not every organisation that exists is notable enough to have an article on wikipedia and I fail to see from the "sources" noted by Epiphyllumlover that notability is established. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.