Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITR-1 SAHAJ
=[[ITR-1 SAHAJ]]=
:{{la|ITR-1 SAHAJ}} – (
:({{Find sources|ITR-1 SAHAJ}})
Looks more like a guideline and handbook. The article don't seems to an enclyopedic topic. Amartyabag TALK2ME 15:43, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia An encyclopedia (also spelled encyclopaedia or encyclopædia)[1] is a type of reference work – a compendium holding a summary of information from either all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge.
Since Wikipedia doesn't focus on any specific branch. Which means it can contain every possible topic /info that is known today. Instead of deleting I think we should keep it live and ask for it to be improved if it looks like a guideline / handbook. TALK2ME —Preceding undated comment added 13:29, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
:: Withdrawing nomination. The article has been re-written in an encyclopedic manner. The content seems legit after reviewing existing articles of similar nature and considering the importance of the article which has a notability. Amartyabag TALK2ME 11:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.