Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITT Technical Institute

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was

Speedy kept, non-admin close. BJ^Talk 10:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

=[[ITT Technical Institute]]=

:{{la|ITT Technical Institute}} ([{{fullurl:ITT Technical Institute|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITT Technical Institute}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Gross lack of npov Woipwoipwoip (talk) 23:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy keep NPOV tags are already on the article. The subject is clearly notable given the multiple reliable sources; NPOV issues can easily be fixed and are not a reason for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy keep, bad-faith nom by an WP:SPA. Corvus cornix_talk 23:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy keep, This is a laughable nomination by a disgruntled editor who is abusing the Articles for deletion process. Mysteryquest (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy keep as bad nom. Subject is clearly notable and AfD is not cleanup. Redfarmer (talk) 00:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.