Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I C Gupta

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[I C Gupta]]=

:{{la|I C Gupta}} ([{{fullurl:I C Gupta|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I C Gupta}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Though there are some references on him at Google News, there doesn't seem to be enough to assert notability of the doctor. Does not pass basic or additional criteria in our biographical notability guidelines. ^blurred _peace ☮ 10:53, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

As is, there is no hint of a place to look for more specialized references

to his claims to notability. Seems like a resume or social ad.

Anything innovative or provokative?

Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 11:17, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:04, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 14:23, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment There do appear to be mentions of this individaul in reliable sources [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=I+C+Gupta&cf=all]. Whether it is enough to make him notable per our guidelines, I don't know. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

:By about the fifth or sixth link down, it's not related to him anymore. I doubt those references directly mention usable information on him (e.g. birth date, fields of specialization, where he graduated from, etc). ^blurred _peace ☮ 19:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

::Yes, on closer inspection there are not even many mentions and I don't see any substantial coverage. I think this is a pretty clear Delete. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Not enough for notability WP:Notability certainly not for WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC).
Delete Very weak and subjective notablility. --Deepak D'Souza 10:32, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I don't think his directorships are enough for WP:PROF #6 and the article presents no evidence that he passes any other criterion of that guideline. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:06, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.