Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Threw Up
=[[I Threw Up]]=
:{{la|I Threw Up}} – (
:({{Find sources|I Threw Up}})
A street art campaign that does not seem to have ever become notable. The only two sources that are indicated in the article itself are both non-secondary (one is the campaign's official site, the other is their official Flickr album). I tried searching for additional sources, both under the "I Threw Up" title used on the article, as well as the "Implied Regurgitation" title currently used on their official site, with no success. Despite their claims that the campaign was written about in various publiciations, I have found no evidence to support this information, and most of the books and magazines that supposidly did write ups on it are unnotable themselves. Rorshacma (talk) 22:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - One link [http://www.ithrewup.com/ primary website] shows this to be experimental. And it does not seem to be catching on as noted above. Maybe in a few years it may be a retro fad, but methinks it has already faded and will never come back. Not notable and not saveable. Jrcrin001 (talk) 01:28, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:43, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - I can find no significant coverage about this art project. The project also goes by the name of "implied regurgitation" which also failed to turn up any coverage. The article makes claims for press coverage without providing actual references, however, looking in the [http://www.ithrewup.com/html/news.html news section] of the project web site finds that [http://www.ithrewup.com/html/newsobsv_07.html news &observer] printed a picture where the sticker had been placed; ditto for [http://www.ithrewup.com/images/news/found_book.jpg Found]; the [http://www.ithrewup.com/html/peelbook08.html PEEL book] is a sticker collection; [http://www.ithrewup.com/images/news/thrill_comp.jpg THRILL] provides a short writeup. Of the lot, only the THRILL piece would be considered coverage in a reliable source and it is very brief. -- Whpq (talk) 16:44, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.