Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian A. B. Wrigley
=[[Ian A. B. Wrigley]]=
:{{la|Ian A. B. Wrigley}} ([{{fullurl:Ian A. B. Wrigley|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian A. B. Wrigley}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Fails WP:BIO : [http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=ytff1-tyc7&p=%22Ian%20Anthony%20Wrigley%22&ei=UTF-8&type= Google] — [http://news.google.com/news?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Ian+Anthony+Wrigley%22 news] — [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Ian+Anthony+Wrigley%22&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search Scholar] - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Unless, of course, all the various "Who's Who"s qualify as sources. Heck, we can print a "Who's Who on Wikipedia" and then use it as "notability" to give people their own articles? I fear some do not understand that anyone at all can print one -- Marquis has no claim to the name in general. Collect (talk) 14:49, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
::Who's Who directories or websites are not reliable. It's a business that relies on selling listings or directories or ads or a combination, etc. They sometimes target specific groups. The information is self-submitted. Drawn Some (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per the lack of reliable sources. I can find nothing to establish this person's notability. Cunard (talk) 15:45, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.