Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Wishingrad

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 02:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

=[[Ian Wishingrad]]=

:{{la|Ian Wishingrad}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ian_Wishingrad Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Ian Wishingrad}})

Every source I can find that mentions Wishingrad is either about one of his companies or is him doing the talking (interviews, TV discussions, etc). His companies may be notable, but I see no indication that he is independently notable from them. Note that previously a draft was declined, a former iteration of this page was speedied, and the creator was warned against creating an autobiography. I don't think even the magic of {{noping|Everymorning}}'s cleaning can fix this one (though I can appreciate the effort made). Primefac (talk) 22:00, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom's cogent argument. Drmies (talk) 00:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, totally agree Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:17, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:42, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete for now as although I found all across Books, News and browser with my first searches, there's nothing to suggest convincingly good improvement. Feel free to draft & userfy if needed, SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.