Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Il mondo della luna (Antal Doráti recording)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Il mondo della luna (Antal Doráti recording)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Il_mondo_della_luna_(Antal_Dor%C3%A1ti_recording) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Il mondo della luna (Antal Doráti recording)}})

Fails all of the criteria of WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings. -- Softlavender (talk) 20:47, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:49, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

• Delete. note that it also fails WP:NALBUM and WP:COPYVIO. The main bulk of the article consists of long paraphrases of critics reviews - these are certainly violations of copyright.Smerus (talk) 07:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
• Comment. The criteria in WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings is from an essay by a WikiProject and does not carry the broad support of wikipedia policy. Further, this guideline section is currently being considered for removal for WP:NPOV concerns, as well as its conflict with the policy at WP:NALBUM.4meter4 (talk) 01:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
• Keep per criteria 1 of WP:NALBUM. In addition to the Gramaphone review cited in the article, I found [https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/03/arts/recordings-view-the-haydn-opera-revival-died-too-soon-but-it-lives-on-disk.html this review] in The New York Times, and [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2738171?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents this scholarly article] by musicologist Michael Brago on the album published in the journal Eighteenth-Century Studies, Vol. 17, No. 3 (Spring, 1984), pp. 308-332. There's certainly a lot of material from that article that would be encyclopedic, and it demonstrates that the recording was an important one.4meter4 (talk) 15:59, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:NALBUM. The article's COPYVIO issue has now been addressed - brief quotes from reviews will be supplied in due course. The album was the first major recording of the opera and is of fundamental importance in its discography. See The Musical Times, March 1979, pp. 227-228; Opera, May 2009, p. 528; David Wyn Jones's Haydn, 2017, p. 215; Paul Fryer's Opera in the Media Age, 2014, p. 191; Elvio Giudici's L'opera in CD e video, 2007, p. 520; Hi-Fi News & Record Review, Vol. 23, Issues 7-12, 1978, p. 135; The New Republic, Vol. 179, 1978, p. 23; Peter Gammond's The illustrated encyclopaedia of recorded opera, 1979, p. 91; High Fidelity/Musical America, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 1978, p. 104; Ulrich Schreiber's Schallplatten Klassik, Auslese, 1979, p. 119; The New Records, Vol. 46-47, 1978, p. 117; Classic CD, Issues 38-43, 1993, p. 70; Records in Review, Vol. 24, 1979, p. 168; The Listener, Vol. 99, 1978, p. 846; Nuova rivista musicale Italiana, Vol. 19, Issues 3-4, p. 535; Études, Vol. 349, 1978, p. 715; Rodolfo Celletti's Il teatro d'opera in disco 1950-1987, 1988, p. 331; American Record Guide, Vol. 41, Issues 7-12, p. 48; and Gramophone Classical Good CD Guide 1998, 1997, p. 422.Niggle1892 (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
• Keep, another notable album that meets WP:NALBUM, attested to by the reviews in the article, and sources listed above. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:14, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.