Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illumination: the Undergraduate Journal of Humanities

:{{la|Illumination: the Undergraduate Journal of Humanities}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Illumination:_the_Undergraduate_Journal_of_Humanities Stats])

:({{Find sources|Illumination: the Undergraduate Journal of Humanities}})

PROD removed without reason given. Non-notable journal. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 21:20, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I couldn't find any sources to establish notability. —Darkwind (talk) 20:09, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 22:06, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

---

• Delete for lack of reliable third-party sources. I'm not sure WP:NJournals is the right guideline for this sort of publication but there's no evidence that it passes WP:GNG either. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:55, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

:*I wasn't sure about NJournals either, that's why I didn't include it in the nom. As you say, doesn't meet GNG (and even if NJournals would apply, doesn't meet that either). --Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:41, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.