Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iman Aminlari

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure)AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 02:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Iman Aminlari]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Iman Aminlari}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Iman Aminlari}})

There don't appear to be any independent, reliable sources about the subject himself. There are a few affiliated sources (his own website, his own YouTube channel, the website of a company he founded), and there are a few articles of questionable reliability and independence about buildings he designed, but nothing that is both reliable and independent about him. There is an assertion that he won a National Architecture Award, but the supporting citation doesn't mention his name anywhere. Overall, I think it fails WP:GNG, but it would be good if users familiar with Persian language sources had a look. Girth Summit (blether) 15:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

  • Comment It is hard to review Iranian sources online and determine what is independent but there should be a process for local experts to weigh in on notability and reliability of sources. Also the article is a stub and may warrant more time for contributionsInfiNeuro (talk) 06:37, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
  • :I wouldn't personally object to draftification, to allow people time to look for sources. We don't tend to keep articles in article space without adequate sourcing. Girth Summit (blether) 10:39, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 04:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

  • Userfy - some dates are CE, some Islamic, and for that and other reasons pointed out already, it's a mess. Bearian (talk) 20:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.