Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Implicit collaboration

:{{la|Implicit collaboration}} ([{{fullurl:Implicit collaboration|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Implicit collaboration}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This was tagged for speedy deletion when first created, but I gave the original editor a chance to fix the article. Some time has passed and the importance has not been asserted. There are no references, and it is suspected OR. He recently removed a prod template. Ndenison ^talk 23:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

• Keep - I was leaning towards delete just looking at the article, but a [http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&hs=YlM&q=%22Implicit%20Collaboration%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp book search] reveals that the term is widely used in the computer industry. A [http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&hs=YlM&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Implicit%20Collaboration%22&sa=N&tab=ns google scholar search] produces several papers regarding the topic, particularly [http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/proceedings/&toc=comp/proceedings/wcre/2004/2243/00/2243toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/WCRE.2004.18 this one]. Seems to pass WP:N. - Toon⁰⁵ 00:05, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per sources found above. Hobit (talk) 03:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.