Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incogni

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Incogni}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Incogni}})

I boldly blanked-and-redirected this article to Surfshark, its parent company. This was disputed on the talk page so now I'm bringing it to AfD. I'll copy my BLAR explanation here: " Looking through the history, this article was created, then subsequently tagged with Template:notability among other clean up tags. It was then redirected to the parent company, Surfshark. Following this redirection, an editor translated the French version of this article (which itself was translated from the earlier English version of this article) back in to English. " {{s|I do not see WP:GNG/WP:NCORP being met here. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 17:18, 5 May 2025 (UTC)}}

Not a great check by me looking back. Clearly enough sources present to justify notability. Keep JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 22:45, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Software. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 17:18, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
• For convenience, this revision is the most complete version of the article: {{oldid2|1191463886|Incogni (December 2023)}} and should probably be looked at for the existing sources. --JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 17:58, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
• Technical note. Currently it is not an article , but a redirect, which is confusing. Shouldn't the article be restored [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incogni&oldid=1288083931 to its "bad" version"] for the purpose of Afd? --Altenmann >talk 18:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

:Comment: coverage from [https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/incogni PC Mag] and [https://www.businessinsider.com/guides/tech/incogni-review Business Insider]. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 18:17, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

• Keep Doesn't look like a good WP:BEFORE check, although I always like WP:BOLD. There's plenty of coverage, here we go: [https://9to5mac.com/2025/04/25/heres-how-and-why-to-delete-your-personal-data-from-the-internet/][https://www.techradar.com/reviews/incogni][https://www.zdnet.com/article/best-data-removal-services/][https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/12/16/how-to-remove-your-personal-information-from-the-internet-with-incogni][https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/internet/incogni-review][https://www.pcmag.com/standard%20roundup/the-best-personal-data-removal-services][https://www.pcworld.com/article/2604849/how-to-delete-yourself-from-internet.html][https://www.howtogeek.com/873954/incogni-personal-information-removal-service-review/][https://cybernews.com/privacy-tools/how-to-remove-my-information-from-the-internet/][https://www.techradar.com/pro/best-data-removal-services-of-year][https://cybernews.com/privacy-tools/best-data-removal-services/][https://www.businessinsider.com/guides/tech/incogni-review]. Per @Altenmann, I request that the page be unblanked.

:AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 18:40, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

::A few of these are adverts, by the way, but yes, GNG is clearly met by the reliable independent ones. Keep. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 20:30, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.