Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incognia

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Incognia}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Incognia}})

Fails WP:NCORP. References are company brochure and manuals and routine business and funding news. scope_creep^Talk 16:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. ULPS ⁽talk • contribs) 18:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:11, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
• Delete since does not meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. The article is not of encyclopedic quality and reads like an advertisement. It was written mostly by a single contributor Special:Contributions/Monalisa_Kozerski_Scalco who mostly contributed opinionated content. Anton.bersh (talk) 17:27, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Given the editor who created the article edited it only a few days before this debate started, a "soft delete" feels like not the right option as we may be back here in a week or two anyways. Relisting to establish further consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 18:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

• Delete. I cannot find any sources that meet NCORP either. Sources in ProQuest were largely press releases. Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.