Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incrediball

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 16:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Incrediball]]=

:{{la|Incrediball}} ([{{fullurl:Incrediball|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incrediball}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

WP:ONEDAY \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 11:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

I have put the references on the page can you show me how to reference properly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkms99 (talk • contribs)

  • Delete - It's not WP:ONEDAY, but [http://www.incrediball.ca/ incrediball] is a company and this ball is just a product of that company. I think the creator of the article has got this confused. Anyway the characteristics of this type of double coloured ball should be mentioned in the Cricket ball article, but it doesn't need an article of its own.Chamal talk 12:55, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete lol cricket. I'm sure it took more than one day to actually create a ball of this nature, but I really don't see the notability in this. If somehow it catches on and becomes referenced in reliable sources by all means this should be recreated. But not now, sorry. Tavix |  Talk  16:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix |  Talk  16:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.