Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Practitioners Network (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 23:55, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Independent Practitioners Network]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Practitioners Network}}

:{{la|1=Independent Practitioners Network}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Independent Practitioners Network}})

Previously deleted. Created by a single purpose editor, no inline citations and surprisingly not 1 hit in google news, which is very unusual for a UK based org. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Psychology, and United Kingdom. LibStar (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

:Delete, some WP:PROMO language and failure of WP:ORG -Samoht27 (talk) 16:55, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete. No indication at all that the group passes either WP:ORGN, WP:SIGCOV or WP:GNG more broadly: zero coverage in [https://www.google.com/search?q="Independent+Practitioners+Network"&client=opera&hs=mWJ&sca_esv=d1df69ed15318afd&tbm=nws&sxsrf=AHTn8zrd57BM8XD2OpbJdDkENQ2Ypd0GxA:1739215917308&source=lnms&fbs=ABzOT_CWdhQLP1FcmU5B0fn3xuWpA-dk4wpBWOGsoR7DG5zJBki0xbyJIUgVJnlXKXyPv8hKB4_YLhfzpVfGXtDVP4BlfbMkRLUq7oO2e4w5B4_1RV-SRW68a0mtXz64JIsAwNsROoMQVnOwzz73EsCmBpk5PCXockt0f4COJG0LBzG0dBx0TmfBnLltPLG8B6212Gz7zhQU&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjeisGX7LmLAxVtQEEAHUH5DK0Q0pQJegQIAhAJ&biw=2506&bih=1271&dpr=1 reliable news outlets]. Serial (speculates here) 19:32, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.