Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index64

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

=[[Index64]]=

:{{la|Index64}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Index64 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Index64}})

Non-notable software. I can't find any reliable secondary sources about it on the web, in GBooks or on GScholar. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:14, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 19:46, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 14:50, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 02:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 11:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete for now as my searches found nothing good. SwisterTwister talk 21:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.