Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Railway Ticket Reservation Codes

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article's subject is found to not be suitable for inclusion on an encyclopedia. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

=[[Indian Railway Ticket Reservation Codes]]=

:{{la|Indian Railway Ticket Reservation Codes}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Indian_Railway_Ticket_Reservation_Codes Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Indian Railway Ticket Reservation Codes}})

Personally I'm not sure what to make of the article....... Anyway can't find evidence of notability fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 04:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

:I don't object to Merging but IMHO none of it seems mergable and then there's the question of "What do we merge?" ... Personally I think deletion is the better option here I honestly do... –Davey2010^Talk 16:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Delete. I'm actually sort of at a loss as to just which notability policy to best link here. But a list of ticket processing codes for Indian rail is going to run afoul of many of them; there's not even a credible claim of notability to be had here. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Merge. Merge this article with the Indian Railways article, rather than delete it. It is likely that these codes are useful in buying tickets and traveling on the Indian Railway trains, but we all know that being useful does not help someone seeking to retain some information on Wikipedia.--DThomsen8 (talk) 14:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

:*Problem is I'm not sure where or what parts could even be Merged, IMHO It doesn't look like it can anywhere but meh that's my 2¢ on it. –Davey2010^Talk 10:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Delete: Wikipedia is not for this purpose. Proposing for delete. Athachil (talk) 07:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Delete Simply not the place for this subject. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (interface) @ 10:30, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Merge -We already have a parent article, information from present one could be covered into, Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation. (courtesy ping : {{U|Dthomsen8}}, I think, IRCTC could be a more suitable merge target). Anupmehra -Let's talk! 00:56, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Merge into IRCTC, Indian Railways, or Railway tickets. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:37, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Delete, Wikipedia is not an Indian railway ticketing manual. Stifle (talk) 10:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Delete, WP:LISTCRUFT in its purest form. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ 16:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Merge Can be merged rather than delete as they do contain encyclopedic content. Wont warrant a separate article but can be merged into any of the parent articles as mentioned by Anupmehra or RSrikanth. Just a table of the codes along with a short description might suffice in any parent article. Lakun.patra (talk) 09:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.