Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indranil Banik

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Indranil Banik}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Indranil Banik}})

Orphaned article about a fairly junior academic who does not meet academic notability guidelines: WP:ACADEMIC OSmeone (talk) 14:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. OSmeone (talk) 14:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• Delete -- per WP:TOOSOON -- on his way up, but at the postdoctoral fellow level notability requires articles from major sources about the person not about the person's research. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 18:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Astronomy, England, and Scotland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• Weak delete. His current academic post and citation record do not convince me of a pass of WP:PROF. We cannot use the Hindu coverage of his work in mainstream media because it was written by him, leaving only a couple of paragraphs mentioning him in NewScientist. I don't think that's significant coverage, and even if it were it would only be one source. My delete is weak largely per WP:TOOSOON: he appears to be on the way up and could well meet our standards for notability in a few years. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:33, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

:There are several links to the article from elsewhere, please see the categories section at the bottom. For instance:

:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:British_astrophysicists 95.175.134.129 (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.