Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infarvision

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WPSNOW MBisanz talk 05:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Infarvision]]=

:{{la|Infarvision}} ([{{fullurl:Infarvision|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infarvision}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

New Article about a contact lens retailer. Notability anyone? –BuickCenturyDriver 08:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

  • There's no inherent reason why a contact lens retailer wouldn't be notable. I'm getting around 400,000 ghits for this one. I think there are justifiable WP:COI concerns but I don't see the argument for deletion. Could you explain?—S Marshall Talk/Cont 08:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
  • :The article was originally created by User:Infarvision, I initially [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Infarvision&diff=prev&oldid=275125806 Userfied] the article, but then I reposted it and nominated it for AFD to see if it is indeed notabile enough to have an article on Wikipedia. –BuickCenturyDriver 08:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

::*Yes, I do see the WP:COI concerns, as I said. But COI isn't grounds for deletion and I think the nomination boils down to WP:JNN. Keep.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 09:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

:::In that case, let's let this nom run it's course and we'll see whether or not other editors will support keeping or deleting the article. –BuickCenturyDriver 10:37, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete - WP:COI aside (which is never grounds for deletion), corporate advert failing WP:CORP, zero GNews hits. Using the internet as a sales medium nowadays is not exactly a valid claim to notability for any corporation. Most of those web hits are directories, pay-to-play listings, mirrors and whatnot. §FreeRangeFrog 17:52, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete, seems to fail WP:CORP. Stifle (talk) 19:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete for failing WP:CORP. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 21:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete no context. Artw (talk) 03:10, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable corporation. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 07:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete speedily. Deb (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:ORG. --Sloane (talk) 22:54, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.