Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infolona

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 22:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

=[[Infolona]]=

:{{la|Infolona}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infolona}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Infolona}})

Recreated CSD-A7 deleted article, fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:WEB. No reliable sources. Creator has been informed on how to prepare the article in userspace, get peer suggestions, etc, but has not done so. Recommend that the article be salted. GregJackP (talk) 14:09, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Iv heard how multiple people can edit an article on infolona. Can any of you admins or some other user fix my article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanmayajain (talk • contribs) 14:13, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but the subject does not meet our standards for inclusion. As you've been told several times, you need to read Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). — Satori Son 20:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy delete. WP:A7: no indication of notability. No coverage in reliable secondary sources^{[http://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=Infolona+-wiki+-myspace+-facebook+-twitter+-linkedin]}. Promotional. — Rankiri (talk) 14:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete as insufficiently notable per WP:CORP#Primary criteria. — Satori Son 20:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete, no reliable sources as needed to establish notability. Nyttend (talk) 22:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete, no evidence of notability, no independent reliable sources. Note that the creator has a COI, as admitted on my talkpage, and appears to have recruited IP editors to chime in on the talk page or edit. Acroterion _(talk) 22:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete There appears to be no strong source showing notability, and it seems extremely unlikely (without sources to the contrary) that a website created a few weeks ago warrants an article. Johnuniq (talk) 01:08, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete - Fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:WEB. Website is still in Beta. --DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 08:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete per WP:CORP#Primary criteria and Wikipedia:Notability (web) -- MaenK.A._Talk 14:19, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.