Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infoplexia

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

=[[Infoplexia]]=

:{{la|Infoplexia}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Infoplexia}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Infoplexia}})

Blatant neologism. No attempt made to show that anybody uses the word. Dicdef at best. — RHaworth {{toolbar|separator=dot|talk | contribs }} 15:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Delete WP:MADEUP. This term exists only on Wikipedia. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:28, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:45, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
delete. I can't find any evidence that this term exists outside the mind of the editor who created this page, borderline CSD G3. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.