Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inlite

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

=[[Inlite]]=

:{{la|Inlite}} ([{{fullurl:Inlite|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inlite}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non notable band. Only claim to notability is winning a minor competition. lacks significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Duffbeerforme (talk) 10:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Fails WP:MUSIC ....unless the HSBC Arena Award is the new name for a Grammy? Nouse4aname (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails to meet WP:MUSIC criteria. Close, but no banana.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 11:28, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, the article have an importance. The music group too. I don't see serious reasons for deletion
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep I admit, the page could have more sources, but it isn't really fair to call it unimportant, especially when you see some of the articles here. Dr.Kermit (talk) 21:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Saying other stuff exists is not a good vote to use in AFD. Schuym1 (talk) 15:43, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep: per [http://www.buffalonews.com/lifearts/next/story/441260.html/ this source]. I am fine with one reliable source that shows notability. Schuym1 (talk) 15:48, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
  • WP:MUSIC requires "multiple non-trivial published works", not just one. Nouse4aname (talk) 16:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
  • And I don't care. Schuym1 (talk) 16:33, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - they look to be an up and coming band, but the coverage at present puts them below the bar for notability -- Whpq (talk) 11:52, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.