Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inner Thoughts

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

=[[Inner Thoughts]]=

:{{la|Inner Thoughts}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inner Thoughts}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Inner Thoughts}})

non notable book. Article creator claims a world record but nothing to back this up. No independent sources. noq (talk) 16:48, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

I do not believe weighing the level of notability applies here. As a celebrity, who ever that person marries, gives birth to, creates, dates, writes, publishes is considered notable... inherently so. Otherwise, thousands of articles on wiki should not even exist. To weigh a book as to whether it is relevant should only apply if the writer is just as new as the book, and the book carries the writer's worth and therefore should be weighed in relevance. But when the writer is a celebrity, whatever that celebrity creates for the public, (movie, books, children, dates) are relevant. I can give you an entire list of people, books, and children who shouldn't even be up there if it weren't for the notability of someone else. Please consider this. Thank you. PeterRoyce (talk) 23:57, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Redirect to author's page, Masiela Lusha. TJRC (talk) 18:33, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, /ƒETCH COMMS / 00:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Delete, since I can't find anything to establish notability, and the title is generic enough that a redirect would not be appropriate. 28bytes (talk) 05:21, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Delete it doesn't seem notable to me either. NZ forever (talk) 07:06, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Delete Doesn't seem very notable, can't find any significant coverage. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 15:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.