Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovation and its Discontents
=[[Innovation and its Discontents]]=
:{{la|Innovation and its Discontents}} ([{{fullurl:Innovation and its Discontents|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovation and its Discontents}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Fails to meet the relevant notability guideline. No indication of notability and no sign that the book is notable GDallimore (Talk) 13:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. I've added a couple of references which show that the book meets criteria #1 of WP:BK. --JD554 (talk) 13:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - Book is notable and meets WP:BK, per JD554. -FrankTobia (talk) 20:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep — was reviewed in [http://www.people.hbs.edu/jlerner/Economist.htm The Economist], [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000BA312-7845-10CF-B4F283414B7F0000 Scientific American], [http://www.people.hbs.edu/jlerner/Newsweek.htm Newsweek], [http://www.people.hbs.edu/jlerner/NYTPatents.htm The New York Times], as well as by many scholarly publications. It is also assigned reading at a [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=safari&rls=en&q=%22innovation+and+its+discontents%22+site%3A.edu+syllabus&btnG=Search number of universities]. As such easily and obviously meets notability requirements #1 and #4 at WP:BK. --Fastfission (talk) 16:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.