Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inovia
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
=[[Inovia]]=
:{{la|Inovia}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Inovia}})
Non-notable web Eng: company. Self promotional sources, self publications. No reliable sources found to identify notability. Fails WP:ORG A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 17:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete – Looks like a successful company, but I couldn't find any third-party sources. Part of the problem is other companies also named Inovia, including the patent lawyers and iNovia Capital, which funds startups.– Margin1522 (talk) 18:48, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Seems like a purely promotional article. {{Huddsblue (talk) 00:06, 27 January 2015 (UTC)}}
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Does not appear to pass WP:GNG with WP:RS and this piece is clearly WP:PROMO. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.