Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inphonex (2nd nomination)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Inphonex}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Inphonex}})

Apologies in advance for editors reviewing this AfD. In any other situation I would PROD this as obviously failing the notability guidelines for companies, but because this quickly-withdrawn AfD exists the article is now permanently ineligible for PROD. – Teratix ₵ 14:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and Florida. – Teratix ₵ 14:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
• Delete: Does not pas CORP; I find no hits about this business in Gnews. Regular Gsearch brings up their website and various PR items. None of which help notability. Article is currently sourced to their website and a press-release. Oaktree b (talk) 16:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 14:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

• Delete Only routine listings found (e.g. Glassdoor, Crunchbase). Nothing independent and significant, so fails WP:NCORP. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
• Delete - no sgnificant independent coverage. - Altenmann >talk 17:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.