Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inprocomm IPN2220

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:49, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

=[[Inprocomm IPN2220]]=

:{{la|Inprocomm IPN2220}} ([{{fullurl:Inprocomm IPN2220|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inprocomm IPN2220}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{find sources|Inprocomm IPN2220}})

Non-notable, rare wireless chip having its own page? Come on, not even common ones like the Ralink RT2573 have their own page!

The article also has an advertisement-esque feel to it. NetRolller 3D 23:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Certainly there are many chipsets which are more common. However, this chipset is present in many Acer and Toshiba notebooks, which makes it far from "rare". It is also one of the few wireless chipsets for which no free driver exists. Sergioag (talk) 04:40, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ascidian | talk-to-me 00:12, 5 September 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inprocomm IPN2220||}}

Comment This discussion was not added to a log page but I've listed it now. (see discussion here). ascidian | talk-to-me 00:12, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 23:21, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete no-notability. Jack007 (talk) 11:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Jake Wartenberg 21:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inprocomm IPN2220||}}

Delete No reliable sources found to verify notability TheWeakWilled (T * G) 01:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete - sources do not support notability. pablo_hablo. 07:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Note to Admin: - the article has never had an AFD tag on it. I have just added the tag. -- Whpq (talk) 16:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Redirect to Inprocomm. As one of their products, it is mentioned in the company article and provides some vefry basic information. It cannot stand alone as all I can find a repress releases - Whpq (talk) 16:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.