Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InsideOut Film
=[[InsideOut Film]]=
:{{la|InsideOut Film}} ([{{fullurl:InsideOut Film|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InsideOut Film}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Non-notable film -- fails WP:N ukexpat (talk) 20:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete There is another movie Inside Out made in 2005, but this isn't the same move, so be careful when googling for hits. For this movie, I found [http://www.afc.gov.au/filmsandawards/filmdbsearch.aspx?view=title&title=INSAOU], and a couple of similar. These only establish that the film exists. I really didn't find anything to show it as notable. DENNIS BROWN (T) (C) 21:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 21:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 08:38, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Film is still in production, independent film at that - and these two points are gonna make it pretty hard for this to survive. Sounds like a decent film, at any rate, but until it achieves notability (maybe getting good words out of Cannes?), it's not going to be here. Yet. No prejudice to recreation if it meets WP:FILM. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete If the film exists it's not notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- ...huh? Your comment makes no sense. Explain? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.