Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InsideTrack

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:InsideTrack}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InsideTrack}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:InsideTrack}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

=[[:InsideTrack]]=

:{{la|1=InsideTrack}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=InsideTrack}})

A marketing article or page about an company that is not notable. It does not have sig coverage in reliable and independent sources. Not realising WP:NCORP. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:41, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:41, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete: Cannot find evidence from reliable sources suggesting GNG or NCORP, subject does not appear to be notable Justi yaya 03:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.