Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside the Forbidden City (1963 film)

:{{la|Inside the Forbidden City (1963 film)}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Inside the Forbidden City (1963 film)}})

This article is a GIGANTIC rip on Inside the Forbidden City (1965 film). I am content in saying that after visiting the two "IMBD listings" (which both led to the 1965 version, that the 1963 one does NOT exist. I have copyed all the info into the 1965 version's talk oage so any neded info can be salvaged and used. Otherwise, it is a waste of space.--Coin945 (talk) 07:58, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 10:45, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:08, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

• Delete. Looks like you're right, but you've got to be careful about copying info over. If it is used, then the history isn't there to see who wrote the material, which breaches our license. Quantpole (talk) 16:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
• G3 blatant misrepresentation of sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:11, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete oh man this is just wrong. Waste of space is right! JBsupreme (talk) 06:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.