Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insite Security (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete as blatant advertising. Technically, the G4 request did not apply as this version was substantially different than the other, but the majority of this article was designed as a promotion, and spent more time promoting the company's founder than it did the company itself. Reso lute 03:03, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Insite Security]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insite Security}}

:{{la|Insite Security}} ([{{fullurl:Insite Security|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insite Security (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This thing has been spammed and speedied 5 times. Creator posted it today at an alternate title and Quadell moved it here over protection/salting without realizing it. Can we please have an AfD to get this gone once and for all. No evidence whatsoever it's notable or passes WP:CORP. StarM 02:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

ETA also deleted at afd once before. StarM 02:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy delete and salt Reposted page; tagged as such. Triplestop x3 02:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
But...but...it has a YouTube reference! Delete for good. Drmies (talk) 02:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.