Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instrumetal

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[Instrumetal]]=

:{{la|Instrumetal}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Instrumetal}})

Non-notable neologism. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Instrumetal&oldid=408649618 Word was "coined" today] according to previous revision of article. Disputed PROD. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Previous revisions claiming coined today are incorrect. Term has been used for years. Article being updated and referenced and properly informative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThadPhallinger (talk • contribs) 14:34, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Don't delete — I have no opinion about whether it should be kept, but if it's judged unworthy of existing in its current state, convert it into a redirect to instrumental. Nyttend (talk) 07:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete then redirect, afterwards, if you think it is a plausible type; no problem there - redirects are cheap. But the term is certainly a neologism, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Can't see it having significant coverage. And the reason I suggest delete before redir is, otherwise this kind of unreferenced (thus pretty useless) pseudo-info has a habit of just reappearing. WP:V. Chzz ► 15:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable neologism without any significant coverage, or prospect of such in the future.--Korruski^Talk 11:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.