Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrejection

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:38, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Integrejection]]=

:{{la|Integrejection}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Integrejection Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Integrejection}})

Recently-introduced neologism with no uptake yet. User also has a history of adding works by the coiner to other articles. ... discospinster _talk 14:07, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:36, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

delete not every day one gets no GHits on a word. Obviously a coinage with no traction. Mangoe (talk) 19:14, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NOTNEO, no sources of any kind found. Sam Sailor 10:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Delete possibly speedy - I see no indication that this isn't anything more than a hoax. Praxidicae (talk) 14:53, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.