Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InterTrader

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 22:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

=[[:InterTrader]]=

:{{la|InterTrader}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/InterTrader Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|InterTrader}})

No evidence that this has any notability. The refs provided show that it exists and promotes itself. Nothing here suggests notability . Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk   23:20, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Weak Delete : Found some news on [https://www.google.co.in/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=8mrZWMHcJ8Ly8AfEjqzQDA&gws_rd=ssl#q=intertrader&tbm=nws&* Google News]. But not sure about the reliability of these reference. Someone please check. --Elton-Rodrigues (talk) 20:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:30, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

  • Weak keep I did not find much promotional content in the article. There definitely exist a few references, but I'm not sure if they make the article notable enough. RoCo(talk) 18:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete -- unremarkable private company going about its business. Sources are insufficient to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The content on product launches and the like belongs on the company web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:CORP -- HighKing++ 12:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.