Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internarrative identity

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No one, except the nominator, advocates deletion of the article. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 17:43, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

=[[Internarrative identity]]=

:{{la|Internarrative identity}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Internarrative identity}})

Nonnotable philosopnical neotheory [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22interNarrative+identity%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&tbm=bks&source=hp&q=%22interNarrative+identity%22+-wikipedia&psj=1&oq=%22interNarrative+identity%22+-wikipedia&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=15891l17823l0l19309l11l11l0l8l0l0l138l366l0.3l3l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=a901005143531e5a&biw=1157&bih=669 nearly no links] beyond wikipedia mirrors and author's works. Lom Konkreta (talk) 01:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Weak keep. Maan's theory may not have had wide takeup in the academic literature, but there's still a published book from Routledge, which was reviewed in The Personalist Forum (see [http://jstor.org/stable/20708835 JSTOR]). And there are a few other citations [http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22internarrative+identity%22&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=on on Google Scholar]. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:41, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Comment. What is missing here is an article on the theory of Narrative identity, to which Maan's theory seems like little more than an interesting footnote. Given such an article, the article under discussion here might well be merged into it. As a standalone article and in the absence of a Narrative identity article, it seems to have undue weight.  --Lambiam 12:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep I think that Maan's book on the subject is notable, or at least just passes the letter of Wikipedia:Notability (books) based on reviews [http://www.jstor.org/pss/20708835 here] and [http://books.google.com/books?id=iRXe7s2PBRUC&pg=PA96&dq=%22Internarrative+identity%22+maan&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3E0kT5CxF6fb0QHOjOmvCA&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Internarrative%20identity%22%20maan&f=false here]. So I'd suggest we refocus this article to focus on the book itself. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:44, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep this topic is notable.read the review [http://www.jstor.org/pss/20708835 Review by Joe Barnhart , University of north texas].--Brat tariq (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
  • That is the same review as referenced above by Tom Morris and also by Mark Arsten. But did you actually read it? It is not by Barnhart, but by Seth Vannatta, Casady School (now at Morgan State University).  --Lambiam 17:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.