Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Phonetic Alphabet/Tables

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to International Phonetic Alphabet chart. (non-admin closure) Nardog (talk) 12:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

=[[:International Phonetic Alphabet/Tables]]=

:{{la|International Phonetic Alphabet/Tables}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/International_Phonetic_Alphabet/Tables Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|International Phonetic Alphabet/Tables}})

WP:DEL13: A subpage in the main namespace. Nardog (talk) 16:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

  • WP:DEL13 is simply another shortcut to WP:ATD, "Alternatives to deletion." Did you mean something else? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:13, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
  • No I didn't. WP:DEL13 is not another shortcut to WP:ATD. In fact it's astonishing one could think that when WP:ATD has got nothing to do with the number 13. Nardog (talk) 13:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Click on it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:42, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  • {{re|Shawn in Montreal}} Are you being serious? It's a shortcut to reasons for deletion #13: "Any other use of the article, template, project, or user namespace that is contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace". Nardog (talk) 19:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • It only looks like it is pointing to WP:ATD--it is actually points to the 13th list element in the section above that. It is a weird redirect, so it is an easy mistake to make. --Mark viking (talk) 06:58, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
  • I was hoping to create a list article for IPA charts, to make it easier to grab symbols without having to scroll through a long article. I apologize if using a subpage wasn't the correct way to do this. Can the article be moved somewhere where it would be acceptable? User:Sweyn7878 20:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
  • You could create a subpage of your userpage, for example User:Sweyn78/IPA Tables or User:Sweyn78/Tables/IPA. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 21:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
  • True, but then it wouldn't be of much help to others. I'm sure I'm not the only one that finds Wikipedia's IPA charts to be among the most convenient methods of interacting with the notation, nor the only person who would desire an IPA list article akin to List of grammatical cases. User:Sweyn7878 21:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
  • There could be a room for an independent article that consists solely of a comprehensive list of IPA tables (in which case I for one think there needs to be prior discussion at Talk:International Phonetic Alphabet), but WP:TITLE directs us not to create a subpage in the main namespace and to give encyclopedic articles "recognizable, concise, natural, precise, and consistent" titles (for reference, look at the titles of the pages under :Category:International Phonetic Alphabet). So we could alternatively move the present page to a more descriptive title without leaving a redirect, but I just think it contains so little content that there's no need for its page history to be preserved. Nardog (talk) 13:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Apologies again for misunderstanding the way things are done here. I think that sounds reasonable; I've created a discussion at Talk:International Phonetic Alphabet#Potential list article regarding this, and I've copied the article's contents to User:Sweyn78/IPA charts. User:Sweyn7878 23:19, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Move to a better page title. Article is perfectly useful but is in a strange location. Α Guy into Books § (Message) -  13:03, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 03:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.