Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International School of Project Management

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 23:14, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

=[[International School of Project Management]]=

:{{la|International School of Project Management}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/International_School_of_Project_Management Stats])

:({{Find sources|International School of Project Management}})

Lack of independent evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:25, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete No evidence found that this organisation has attained notability. (I'm also noting that the article author appears to have links with one of the principal people associated with this organisation and whose biography has been linked from the page: link.) AllyD (talk) 18:13, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete The article is riddled with neutral point of view problems because its author is linked to the organization. In addition, the subject's notability is not verifiable. These sources -- [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8TA1OAgC1U 1], [http://www.firstpost.com/topic/place/new-delhi-ispm-international-school-of-project-management-launched-i-video-D8TA1OAgC1U-140-6.html 3], and [http://www.ispm.in/events.html 5] -- are not reliable sources because they originate from the organization that is the topic of the article. The other sources -- "15 Nov 2010 Business Standard" and "Hindustan Times, Faridabad Connect 19 Nov 2010 page no:5" -- cannot be verified. "Verifiability, No original research and Neutral point of view are Wikipedia's core content policies." - ʈucoxn\talk 22:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - Article creator has a COI which has lead to numerous POV issues. Additionally, as other users have pointed out, the sources provided are not WP:RS. Institution in general does not meet WP:GNG - Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 08:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.