Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet exchange route server

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

=[[Internet exchange route server]]=

:{{la|Internet exchange route server}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Internet_exchange_route_server Stats])

:({{Find sources|Internet exchange route server}})

First of all, this is an internet draft. It's not a standard, and has never been deployed. Thus it pretty much fails WP:N. Secondly, it's mostly a bunch of technical text copied from the draft, which is a WP:NOT issue. Third, there's a clear WP:COPYVIO problem. There's no reason for us to have this article. Kerfuffler (talk) 06:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete per G12. Unambiguous copyright infringement. Delete Large parts of the article are copy/pasted from [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jasinska-ix-bgp-route-server-03#section-2.1 this], which has a copyright statement containing "All rights reserved." ie: incompatable with CC-BY-SA 3.0. Get rid. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

:I agree, but every time I file a G12 CSD, it gets rejected because of a single line that can't be traced to the original. *sigh* Kerfuffler (talk) 09:26, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

::I've removed all copyright violations and we're left with two paragraphs, neither of which helps establish the notability of this article, so remaining with delete. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow Talk 02:13, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete Work in progress at IETF. Not yet notable. Revive once fully baked. --Kvng (talk) 17:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete: WP:TOOSOON: this is a draft, not a standard yet. -- BenTels (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.