Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet sexual addiction

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 05:04, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

=[[Internet sexual addiction]]=

:{{la|Internet sexual addiction}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Internet sexual addiction}})

I don't see enough scholarly research solely on this topic to warrant an article [http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?lr=&cr=&safe=offactive&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&q=%22Internet%20sexual%20addiction%20%22&sa=N&tab=ws] Anything useful information will be better suited in Sexual addiction and Pornography addiction SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 05:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

:*Additional note Uncle G has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Internet_sexual_addiction&diff=479619586&oldid=479604626 added] some more books in the "Further Reading" section which deal with sex addiction in the context of internet, and I think those will be more suitable in the Sexual addiction article. --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 08:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep. There are literally [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22internet+sexual+addiction%22&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 hundreds of books] dealing directly with "internet sexual addiction". — Cirt (talk) 18:17, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Lots of search results. How much scholarly research does the proposer want? --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:42, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Withdrawing nom per the arguments presented above. --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 04:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.