Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intolerant (Ylvis song)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 11:28, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
=[[Intolerant (Ylvis song)]]=
:{{la|Intolerant (Ylvis song)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Intolerant (Ylvis song)}})
Two-line stub about a song, making no substantive claim of notability under WP:NMUSIC, and citing no reliable source coverage. The mere fact that a song exists is not, in and of itself, enough to qualify it for a standalone Wikipedia article — that takes winning or being nominated for a major "Song of the Year" award, attaining noteworthy success on record charts, or other criteria that elevate the song well above the notability level of most other songs. Normal wikipractice is to redirect a non-notable song to the album from whence it came, but this isn't from an album — while redirecting this to the artist instead could be an option, I'm not sure how valuable that would be and I don't imagine it being all that likely a search term in its own right since anybody who actually was looking for it would have to already know who the artist was anyway. So all in all, my view is that we should just delete it. Bearcat (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. [http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/stargazing_blog/2014/11/the_new_ylvis_song_is_about_being__intolerant_.html This] was the best I could find in terms of coverage. It does not appear to be a notable song, no matter what the fox says. Gongshow talk 19:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- delete nn. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.