Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iqbal Singh Lalpura

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Iqbal Singh Lalpura}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Iqbal Singh Lalpura}})

Non notable politician who fails to meet any criterion form WP:NPOL. Celestina007 (talk) 18:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
• Delete: Fails WP:NPOL does not hold a notable position. Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 12:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
• Keep - appears to be notable, see https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/chandigarh/who-is-iqbal-singh-lalpura-the-former-cop-chosen-as-national-minorities-commission-head-7501050/ , https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/ex-cop-iqbal-singh-lalpura-who-arrested-jarnail-singh-bhindranwale-is-national-minority-commission-chief-308470 , https://www.business-standard.com/article/elections/lalpura-resigns-as-ncm-chief-after-bjp-fields-him-in-punjab-assembly-polls-122020101684_1.html , https://www.firstpost.com/india/ex-ips-iqbal-singh-lalpura-who-probed-1978-sikh-nirankari-clash-to-head-national-minorities-commission-9950091.html , https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjp-spokesperson-iqbal-singh-lalpura-to-head-national-commission-for-minorities-report-2534501 --Soman (talk) 01:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
• Delete As per nom, fails WP:NPOL. JoyStick101 (talk) 12:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
• Keep why should the chairman of National Commission for Minorities not be notable ? There are enough references which could be added to the article.Inwind (talk) 17:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

• Keep Failing NPOL does not provide grounds for deletion, it simply means the subject does not meet those specific criteria for presumed notability, not notability in general. Sources provided by {{noping|Soman}} above satisfy passing of the GNG. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

:Delete does not pass GNG Puglia1999 (talk) 23:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

• Delete. Reasons below:

1. The Indian Express source says 'Express News service' and hence, not independent. IE is a reputed source and when they are not putting a byline, it means they don't want to take accountability of it.
2. Same goes for Tribune
3. Business standard says Press Trust of India. Not independent.
4. Firstpost says FP Staff but in the end says 'inputs from agencies' which dilutes the independence. It means, some information was fed to FP that they used to write this. If it had some independent commentary, it could have been used to assert notability.
5. NDTV is again Press Trust of India, likely to be fed by the party or his media team.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.