Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Horse Park Airdrie

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Iron_Horse_Park_Airdrie}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Iron_Horse_Park_Airdrie}})

Doesn't meet WP:GNG and no sources are available other than the park's webpage and travel blogs advertising the park. Endersslay (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
• Comment This seems locally notable, so I think it depends whether you see this as a park or an organization (does WP:AUD apply). https://www.airdriecityview.com/community/full-steam-ahead-for-iron-horse-parks-2023-season-6973978 https://www.discoverairdrie.com/articles/all-aboard-for-the-reopening-of-iron-horse-park https://dailyhive.com/calgary/vacation-europe-calgary https://airdrielife.com/lifenow/iron-horse-park-on-track-great-for-2021-season/ ~ A412 ^talk! 20:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries, Organizations, and Travel and tourism. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

• Keep - Wikipedia is full of articles about locally notable attractions. Please see :Category:Lists of museums in the United States by state or territory and others. And FYI, I've edited hundreds of such articles on Wikipedia. Regarding sourcing, that which you see as travel blogs, are often not blogs but how museums etc. are written about. I added a couple of sources and info, so hope that helps. — Maile (talk) 00:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
• Merge into Airdrie, Alberta. This is a tricky one. I abandoned an AfC draft on a theme park a few months ago that was in a similar situation: that theme park was much larger (20+ attractions), but very few online sources were available. In that draft, as in this article, I see two issues: one is notability; the other is coverage. Putting notability aside, I'm not seeing the coverage question adequately satisfied here. Do the available reliable sources say that much, beyond run-of-the-mill coverage like opening hours, to justify a standalone article? To avoid an unsatisfying WP:PERMASTUB, I think the current contents of the article can be adequately summarised into three or four well-cited sentences on the settlement page (that is, Airdrie, Alberta). We can then hope that one day, there will be enough coverage for an editor to recreate the article. And then we can talk about whether local attractions are notable or not. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 03:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

• Keep Iron Horse Park Airdrie has just enough notability to merit an article. TH1980 (talk) 01:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

:Weak Keep - seems notable and interesting Mr Vili talk 23:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.