Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iruma Rioka

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Iruma Rioka]]=

:{{la|Iruma Rioka}} ([{{fullurl:Iruma Rioka|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iruma Rioka}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Delete article does not assert that any of the CDs released were on a notable label or other notability; sources likely to be in Japanese hampers the ability to determine whether sufficient coverage exists, but given that 2 of the 3 sources are not independent, there's only 1 to be given benefit of doubt: fails WP:MUSIC. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 02:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete - Does not appear to satisfy notability criteria of WP:MUSIC. --DAJF (talk) 02:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete: insufficient 3rd party notability. JamesBurns (talk) 00:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete per lack of independent sources to establish WP:N. --Artene50 (talk) 03:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.