Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isle of Wight Foxhounds
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
=[[:Isle of Wight Foxhounds]]=
:{{la|1=Isle of Wight Foxhounds}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Isle of Wight Foxhounds}})
Unclear what this mess of an article us supposed to be about. The history of fox hunting on the Isle of Wight or this specific hunting group? The article itself fails to make a credible claim to notability. The group fails WP:ORGCRIT as lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." AusLondonder (talk) 05:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organizations, and England. AusLondonder (talk) 05:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. An Isle of Wight Wiki or a Hunting Wiki could host articles like this, but we are better off without them. RobinCarmody (talk) 23:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Based on the one external link being used and the information in stub here, it looks like this article was intended as being about a particular group of hunters called the "Isle of Wight Foxhounds", which do not appear to pass the WP:GNG. The only source is the group's own website, which clearly fails at being a reliable, secondary source. Searching for additional sources only brings up brief mentions while discussing something else (mentioning that someone was a member, for example), or mentions in local news sources. Rorshacma (talk) 15:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.