Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivana Milojević

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Ivana Milojević}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Ivana Milojević}})

While there is some coverage, it all appears to be about a Serbian pilot. Can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show they meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Yugoslavia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:40, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:40, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:40, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
• Delete, GNG not established from the article. --Tone 20:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
• Delete-- I cannot find any IRSs to show she meets GNG. Fails WP:PROF (because she only attained Adjunct Professor position (a claim that I cannot find a single IRS for, in any event)). I thought possibly WP:TOOSOON but her positions were supposedly in 2010. Just can't find anthing to show she is notable, rather than just an average academic. Cabrils (talk) 21:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
• Weak delete. The case isn't as weak as I expected, but I don't think this meets our notability criteria. The subject has a lot of works with some citations on Google Scholar, but I'm not seeing the few highly cited works that I'd look for with WP:NPROF. There are two books, with three reviews in total, which I think is short of WP:NPROF WP:NAUTHOR. A editor could in good faith make an argument for a combined WP:NPROF and WP:NAUTHOR case, but I think it's a bit WP:TOOSOON. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BIO. As nom says, coverage seems to be mainly about a pilot of the same name. LibStar (talk) 03:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.