Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivy gate
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 17:17, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
=[[Ivy gate]]=
:{{la|Ivy gate}} – (
:({{Find sources|Ivy gate}})
Estate agency, which fails WP:ORG and asserts WP:INHERITORG regarding James Caan link. Mentions only seem to cover industry pages, but nothing outside this. No references. scope_creep talk 18:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 06:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - very run of the mill real estate sales company. Really little more than spam. It does not inherit notability from one of its investors. Bearian (talk) 18:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:46, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: little coverage, and in dubious sources which talk more about how Caan has invested in a startup (a standard event) than how there's a noteworthy new startup in town. Not notable. BethNaught (talk) 09:53, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.