Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Colin Partridge

:{{la|J. Colin Partridge}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/J._Colin_Partridge Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|J. Colin Partridge}})

Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG Flat Out (talk) 06:57, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator - sourced content added post nomination supports notability per WP:PROF. Flat Out (talk) 05:16, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

• Strong Delete Simply not notable. scope_creep (talk) 08:21, 29 September 2015

• Comment: Exactly how is someone who is a full professor of medicine and holds a named chair at "one of the world's leading universities" in his field (as the Wikipedia article on the university puts it), who is cited 4,000 times in scientific literature, who has an h-index of 29, and who has been honored by a foreign government for his contributions to medicine, "simply not notable," since you offer no rationale for this strange claim? Komolaquo (talk) 15:42, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

• Comment: he meets the test as an academic if he is named professor. Does this count, DGG? --JumpLike23 (talk) 03:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
• Keep. According to [http://issuu.com/ucmeded/docs/ome_2013_yir_final this document] (p.21) he held the chair from 2007–2013 and is now a professor emeritus, but the timing doesn't matter; he passes WP:PROF#C3 regardless. He also passes #C1 by having many highly cited publications (nine with over 100 cites). —David Eppstein (talk) 06:44, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
• Keep - appears to pass WP:PROF. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:11, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
• Keep passes WP:PROF. --JumpLike23 (talk) 02:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.