Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. D. Scott

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. asilvering (talk) 05:52, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

=[[:J. D. Scott]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=J. D. Scott}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=J. D. Scott}})

A longtime redirect to Oneok (for [https://tulsaworld.com/archive/j-d-scotty-scott-former-chairman-and-ceo-of-oneok-dies-at-81/article_388413a4-c813-5b82-9225-636c4800ba42.html former Oneok chairman and CEO J.D. "Scotty" Scott]) was hijacked as an WP:ADMASQ page for an Iowa deputy sheriff's [https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0F89KC9DC self-published novel]. The book is not notable, and beyond [https://www.amestrib.com/story/news/2017/11/30/for-nora-story-co-sheriff/16930582007/ a human-interest story in his local newspaper] I'm not seeing any WP:SIGCOV that would qualify for a pass of WP:GNG. I would have just restored the redirect but it was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._D._Scott&diff=prev&oldid=1290079298 previously contested], so in the absence of passing WP:N I'm seeking an AfD consensus to restore the redirect to Oneok. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

:The idea that a Wikipedia page titled J. D. Scott should redirect to the company Oneok simply because a former CEO was named "Scotty Scott" is, frankly, ridiculous. Wikipedia is not owned or dictated by corporate entities, and a company does not gain perpetual rights over a personal name—especially one as common as J. D. Scott—based solely on a former executive's nickname.

:More importantly, the previous version of the J. D. Scott page referred to a legitimate author, complete with reliable sources, and was improperly deleted to reinstate a redirect that serves no encyclopedic purpose. The argument that the redirect was "longstanding" does not justify replacing a fact-based article about a notable individual with a misleading and irrelevant corporate redirect.

:Wikipedia’s mission is to provide accurate, verifiable information—not to protect redirects rooted in corporate confusion or coincidental name overlap. The deletion of sourced content in favor of such a redirect undermines the integrity of the platform. 158.120.123.239 (talk) 20:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

::I'm OK with a redirect somewhere else but I am not OK with a page being hijacked to promote a non-notable author's self-published book. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Should probably be redirected to JD Scott, who appears to be an actually notable author. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:26, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete the content currently there - it's local, insignificant coverage about a cop who wrote a book. Bearian (talk) 01:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete Since notability is not established. Reads like a prmotion for the author/book. Ramos1990 (talk) 01:00, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.