Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Kraynick

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Jack Kraynick]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Jack Kraynick}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Jack Kraynick}})

As this page stands, it fails WP:NCOLLATH, and almost all sports content on page falls under WP:ROUTINE. The one rebuttal, the selection in 1939 draft doesn't cut it as per WP:NGRIDIRON. Hyperwave11 (talk) 00:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

:*I also found coverage from The Charlotte News (listed in the article), further convincing me Kraynick meets the notability requirements. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

::*[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/89279122/rocky-mount-telegram/ Here's] some more coverage (though short) from the Rocky Mountain Telegram and [https://www.newspapers.com/clip/89279341/the-news-and-observer/ here's] an additional piece from The News and Observer. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:11, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

:::*Also, I'd like to note that 1. failing NGRIDIRON, NCOLLATH or any other SNG is completely irrelevant if the topic in question meets the general notability guideline and 2. Routine coverage applies to events, and not people according to this essay. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.